The
Prioritization Practice
In its simplest form, Prioritization
engages the business managers of an enterprise in assessing the bottom-line
impact of proposed IT initiatives using the same yardsticks for every
project. Risk assessment may also be included in the assessment. The result
is a prioritized ranking of projects with which management can rationally
allocate resources to the highest value initiatives.
Mechanically, the process involves
five steps:
-
First, the process engages senior managers in
defining the strategic intentions for the company, assigning a relative
weight for the importance of each, and coming to consensus on the
definitions and scales with which IT projects will be assessed. Through
this consensus-building step, senior managers can be assured of consistent
interpretation of strategic intentions, while signaling the organization
that IT initiatives will be assessed fairly, consistently, and from an
enterprise perspective.
-
All IT projects are described in business terms
in a short, consistent way, providing a single source description for all
proposed IT initiatives. The business sponsor of each project is
responsible for this description. In this way, the company has a complete,
business-oriented view of its IT initiatives.
-
Using a
defined cause-and-effect scale for each strategic intent, managers assess
the predicted impact of every initiative on each of the strategic
intentions. Managers are looking at cause and effect relationships between
projects and strategic intentions: if we do this project, what impact will
it have on each of our strategic intentions? Each manager must assess all
projects. This step results in wide understanding in the business managers
of all IT initiatives, how they relate across all parts of the business, and
their impact on the strategic intentions.
For the simple example shown here, each initiative
is assessed for impact on the strategic intention (the impact
column.) In addition, each initiative is rated for business and technical
risk, and the resources required identified. In this case, the company
believed the scarcest resource was its professional IT staff, not dollars.
-
In a joint forum, the assessing managers review
all assessments. This allows for open discussion of different assessments
and subsequent consensus development of the resulting priorities.
-
IT develops a proposed project plan based on the
priorities, resource constraints, and scheduling dependencies.
The overall result is an across the
board understanding of IT's complete efforts, their impact on strategic
intentions, and the resources required to move forward. Most important, the
process foments change in the underlying management culture regarding IT.
IT becomes a set of high-value initiatives, focused on the strategic
intentions, with business management buy-in of the business impact of IT
efforts. S
The prioritization of IT initiatives
is based on the cause-and-effect connection between the IT initiative and
the strategic intention. We ask the specific question: if we invest in
this IT initiative, what will be the predicted effect on each of the
company’s strategic intentions? For example, if the IT initiative is a
customer information system, then its expected impact on cost reduction
might be minor, on supplier of choice, perhaps none, but on
Acquisition Capability, the impact might be a major component of what is
required to acquire and integrate a new company.
Prioritization is done through a
structured assessment that carries out the logic described above. The
figure below shows the specific assessment of a proposed customer
information system, against strategic intentions.
The prioritization practice can
include financial aspects of initiatives such as ROI, risk factors, and the
more elaborate forms of option theory that work to quantify the estimates
risks and financial returns. All of these are applied in the prioritization
rank-ordering process.
Note that, in the above
prioritization scorecard, the strategic intentions are:
| Strategic Intention |
Weight |
| Cost Reduction |
25 |
| Supplier of Choice |
10 |
| Targeted Market Growth |
10 |
| Acquisition Capability |
10 |
| Customer Cost |
20 |
| Standard/Best Practices |
10 |
| Capacity Increase |
5 |
| Product Mix Optimization |
10 |
| |
|
| Total |
100 |
|